Author: martin fierz
Date: 04:12:37 08/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 03, 2004 at 05:53:31, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On August 03, 2004 at 04:21:45, martin fierz wrote: > >>ah, i just read your answer above - sorry for asking a second time... hmm, i'll >>have to try this! >> >>any idea how much better your "correct" MVV/LVA is compared to the value >>comparison? > >It depends on the rest of the program. But it could be quite significant. > >It's one of these things were everybody gets it wrong the first time >because the most logical thing to do is not correct because of the >weird stuff an alphabeta searcher looks at :) > >-- >GCP hmm, this sounds great! if it is a significant improvement, i can throw out my SEE again which doesn't seem to be working as well as i hoped it would... :-) cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.