Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Advantage of MVV\LVA over MVV

Author: Anthony Cozzie

Date: 06:08:14 08/03/04

Go up one level in this thread

On August 03, 2004 at 05:53:31, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On August 03, 2004 at 04:21:45, martin fierz wrote:
>
>>ah, i just read your answer above - sorry for asking a second time... hmm, i'll
>>have to try this!
>>
>>any idea how much better your "correct" MVV/LVA is compared to the value
>>comparison?
>
>It depends on the rest of the program. But it could be quite significant.
>
>It's one of these things were everybody gets it wrong the first time
>because the most logical thing to do is not correct because of the
>weird stuff an alphabeta searcher looks at :)
>
>--
>GCP

How is this not standard MVV/LVA?

To me this seems exactly equivalent to:


value = (victim_value << 10) - attacker_value;

or some such, which would also sort things into MVV/LVA order . . .

anthony

• Re: Advantage of MVV\LVA over MVV Anthony Cozzie 06:09:23 08/03/04
  • Re: Advantage of MVV\LVA over MVV Gian-Carlo Pascutto 06:52:44 08/03/04
    • Re: Advantage of MVV\LVA over MVV Anthony Cozzie 08:33:48 08/03/04
      • Re: Advantage of MVV\LVA over MVV(380480 is not my post) Uri Blass 09:55:31 08/03/04
    • Re: Advantage of MVV\LVA over MVV Dan Honeycutt 07:11:07 08/03/04
      • Re: Advantage of MVV\LVA over MVV Gian-Carlo Pascutto 07:20:07 08/03/04
        • Re: Advantage of MVV\LVA over MVV Dan Honeycutt 07:32:59 08/03/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.