Author: Mike Castañuela
Date: 09:24:49 01/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 01, 1999 at 10:51:51, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On January 01, 1999 at 10:28:17, Mike Castañuela wrote: > >>On January 01, 1999 at 07:03:06, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >> >>>Nimzo 99a beat Crafty 16.1 6.5-3.5. Next match, Genius 6 - Junior 5. >>> >>>Two PII-400/256, auto232, 40 moves in 40 minutes. >>> >>> J5 H7 M8 T11 F532 F5 R10 N99a Cr TOTAL Elo >>>J5 --- 6 6 6.5 5.5 4.5 5 5 8.5 47.0/80 55 >>>H7(*) 4 --- 3.5 4 4.5 8 7 6.5 7.5 45.0/80 39 >>>M8 4 6.5 --- 5.5 3.5 5 5.5 7 7 44.0/80 31 >>>Ti 3.5 6 4.5 --- 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 44.0/80 31 >>>F532 4.5 5.5 6.5 5 --- 4.5 4 5 7 42.0/80 16 >>>F5 5.5 2 5 4.5 5.5 --- 4.5 4 8 39.0/80 -8 >>>R10 5 3 4.5 4 6 5.5 --- 5 5.5 38.5/80 -12 >>>N99a 5 3.5 3 3.5 5 6 5 --- 6.5 37.5/80 -19 >>>CR(**) 1.5 2.5 3 3 3 2 4.5 3.5 --- 23.0/80 -141 >>> >>> >>>(*) A beta version of Hiarcs 7 with an alpha opening book played in the matches >>>against Junior 5, Tiger 11.7.5, Mchess 8, Rebel 10 and Fritz 5. >>> >>>(**) Crafty 16.1 is playing as an engine for Nimzo 99. Because of a bug in the >>>interface, Crafty clears its hashtables after every move it makes and therefore >>>it is playing handicapped in this tournament. >>> >>>Enrique >> >>Interesting tournament; beforehand, is my opinion that G6 >>it does not have to be tested, because by that I have listened >>G6 is a G5 more slow; only until the 32 bit optimized and >>improved (engine) be released proceeds its testing. >>(e.g. Crafty defeats this 6-5-3.5 or something about) > >I didn't have time yet to check for differences between G6 and G5. I am told >that there are some, but minor. Being 16 bit in a 32 bit environment, I expect >G6 to be a bit slower than G5, but not all that much. As for entering Genius 6 >in this tournament, I think it's very interesting. Genius is very accurate and >once it bites it won't let go. That's exactly what I see now in its match >against Junior 5. G6 wins 2-1 and it's +3 in the 4th game, so a likely +2 =2 -0. >In these games, Genius 6 is playing very actively, something really unusual in >older versions. > >Enrique Thanks for your observations, very rare by MCS owners. I myself and others are expecting reviews of MCS (KK: do you hear me?); Too is surprise see how much well Tiger is doing (by new). Of the pgn games, I see that MC7 have the most atractive and nice style (active). Could you to make a brief summary of the participant programs (style)? Thanks and HNY.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.