Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: quiescence deep

Author: Cesar Contreras

Date: 12:28:54 08/04/04

Go up one level in this thread

>
>  This is the idea. The implementation is more fun if you figure out ;)
>
>  José C.

I have implemented something that works like that, maybe it's a bad
implementation, but it got's worse than without SEE.

I see some problem calculating echanges on a unique square, because exchanges
can affect many squares. Let's say white take a bishop en e3, but black can take
a queen on d5. Something like this. And if i use it for prunnig i think i can
miss some good captures. I'm missing something?

• Re: quiescence deep milix 10:32:56 08/05/04
• Re: quiescence deep Volker Böhm 13:04:00 08/04/04
  • Re: quiescence deep Klaus Friedel 13:46:26 08/05/04
  • Re: quiescence deep José Carlos 13:46:51 08/04/04
    • Re: quiescence deep Volker Böhm 14:05:31 08/04/04
    • Re: quiescence deep Cesar Contreras 13:58:15 08/04/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.