Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 20:38:46 08/04/04
Nothing technical here that anyone can really chew on and I don't expect any huge insights from myself or anyone; but I have had nothing but bitter frustration after trying to implement something ostensibly simple: avoiding a full move generation after a successful has lookup. My version with that feature is still 8.5% slower than the version that does a full move gen and looks for the hash move afterwards. Nothing like banging one's head against a concrete wall for a week.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.