Author: Mark Young
Date: 12:09:43 08/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 05, 2004 at 13:29:20, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On August 05, 2004 at 10:49:05, Mark Young wrote: > >>CPU P4 2.53 >>TC 60/30 >>Hash Tables 400 MB >>Book 4GB opening book. Each program plays with their own copy. >>5 man TB (Pro Deo 1.0 has no TB access) >> >>Shredder 8 playing with MK setting. >> >> >>Mark 2004 >> >> 1 2 3 4 >>1 Shredder 8 ********** ½11011000½ ½11½111100 0½0½½11½11 18.0/30 >>2 Pro Deo 1.0 ½00100111½ ********** 10110½010½ ½0½0½1½1½0 14.5/30 221.00 >>3 Deep Fritz 8 ½00½000011 01001½101½ ********** 01½1110½1½ 14.5/30 211.00 >>4 Shredder 7.04 1½1½½00½00 ½1½1½0½0½1 10½0001½0½ ********** 13.0/30 > > > Hi Mark > Still a very convincing performance of Pro Deo 1.0 in > my opinion. It will be interested to see if things > continue in this way. > Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com] I have not gone over the games, but I remember seeing a position that Pro Deo got hurt because of no EGTB. So I am sure the lack of TB cost Pro Deo 1.0 a 1/2 point in this test and maybe more. Now we move to 3 Mins a move test. I will post updates.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.