Author: Michael Henderson
Date: 17:57:06 08/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 05, 2004 at 20:01:29, Cesar Contreras wrote: >I'm trying to improve my move ordering, with a little success, principal due to >correct my understanding and implementation MVA\LVV. I had not sucess with SEE. >Anyway, i think my tree it's still too big. > >I need to know if i can do any more about it. > >currently i do: > >1.- Moves on transposition, ordered by evaluation (some one suggested me order >by node count, why do you think?) >2.- Killer moves. >3.- History heuristics. >4.- All promotion moves. >5.- All capture moves. >6.- All remaining non-capture-non-promotion moves. > >What i see on this list it's that the last "non-capture-non promotion moves", >comes last, but i think it's to frecuently that the best move it's not a capture >or promotion move. > >I'm thinking of make some Mix, first try the best promotion move, then the best >capture move, and then the best non-capture-non-promotion move, then the next >best promotion move, and so on. > >What do you think about it? captures/promotions should go after hash table move, then killers (do not allow captures/promotions in killers), then history for the rest of the moves
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.