Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: in some cases humans are much better in tactics than computers

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 15:10:20 08/07/04

Go up one level in this thread


On August 07, 2004 at 17:58:36, Wayne Lowrance wrote:

>On August 07, 2004 at 17:07:59, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On August 07, 2004 at 16:49:52, Robin Smith wrote:
>>
>>>On August 07, 2004 at 14:20:19, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>
>>>>On August 07, 2004 at 14:03:52, Rob Basham wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On August 07, 2004 at 11:17:59, David Dahlem wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On August 07, 2004 at 08:51:51, Thomas Lagershausen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>[D]3r2rk/3n1pp1/2p1b2p/3q3P/pp1PNQ2/2P2P2/PP6/KB4RR w - - 0 29
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In this speedchessgame in round two of the fide-wcc 2004 the IM Neelotpal
>>>>>>>(2457)found with 29.Rg1-g6 !! with the thread to sacrifice the rook on h6 the
>>>>>>>strongest move to show that white is not(!) worse in this position.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I bet that every computer of the world wouldn´t have found this in a compareable
>
>Someone, please describe a "fortress" tku
>Wayne

In first  reading it seems that you post nothing because you did not care to
delete the words after your post.

Fortress is a position when one side has material advantage but the material
does not help to win because no progress is possible.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.