Author: David Dahlem
Date: 16:10:02 08/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 07, 2004 at 18:07:09, Graham Banks wrote:
>On August 07, 2004 at 17:30:39, David Dahlem wrote:
>
>>On August 07, 2004 at 17:01:38, Graham Banks wrote:
>>
>>>Athlon XP2000
>>>256mb hash each (or closest allowed by each program)
>>>3,4,5 piece tablebases
>>>All using Fritz Powerbook tournament book (maximum variety, minimum 5 games for
>>>a move to be played, no learning)
>>>40 moves in 40 minutes repeating.
>>>Ponder off
>>>Tournament run under Deep Fritz 8 GUI
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>STANDINGS (after 38 of 76 rounds)
>>>
>>>29.5 - CM9000 Judge II
>>>24.0 - List 512
>>>23.5 - Gandalf 5.1
>>>23.0 - SOS 4
>>>22.5 - Thinker 4.6c
>>>22.5 - Rebel 12
>>>22.0 - Pharaon 2.62
>>>21.0 - CM 10th Edition (default)
>>>21.0 - Delfi 4.5
>>>18.0 - Anaconda 1.6.2
>>>18.0 - Deep Sjeng 1.6
>>>18.0 - Tao 5.6
>>>17.0 - Gothmog 1.0b10
>>>16.5 - El Chinito 3.25
>>>15.5 - Yace 0.99.87
>>>15.0 - Crafty 19.15
>>>14.5 - Little Goliath Revival
>>>13.5 - Fruit 1.5
>>>13.5 - Slow Chess 2.93a
>>>11.5 - Comet B68
>>>
>>>The top three programs apart from CM9000 Judge II and CM 10th Edition will play
>>>in the final stage of Super Tournament III at 40 moves in 120 minutes repeating.
>>>
>>>The games and crosstable should be up on Kurt’s website sometime soon. .
>>>http://www.utzingerk.com/banks/st_03_qual.htm
>>>
>>>I will now be replacing Rebel 12 with Pro Deo 1.0 and rerunning the first 38
>>>games before proceeding into the second half of the tournament as I like to try
>>>and keep all current program versions in my tournament.
>>>
>>>Comments welcome.
>>>Graham.
>>
>>Hi Graham
>>
>>I really can't understand the poor showing of CM 10th Edition (default). For me,
>>it plays much stronger than this. :-)
>>
>>Regards
>>Dave
>
>
>Hi Dave,
>I don't think that CM 10th Edition will require as much tweaking as CM9000 in
>order to get stronger settings. I'd obviously put the selectivity up to 12 and
>I'd change the material values slightly. Apart from these, I can't see too many
>weak areas of play - maybe pawn weaknesses might need altering upwards?
>I'm very interested in the results you've had with CM 10th Edition (default) if
>you'd like to share them.
>Graham.
Ok, here's a quick rundown according to EloStat.
Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
1 Shredder 8 : 2486 92 87 43 64.0% 2386 34.9%
2 Shredder 7 : 2409 199 106 15 53.3% 2386 53.3%
3 TheKing 3.33 : 2384 55 74 79 44.9% 2419 39.2%
4 TheKing 3.23 : 2365 118 191 16 46.9% 2386 43.8%
5 Ruffian Leiden : 2005 382 218 5 10.0% 2386 20.0%
Regards
Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.