Author: Graham Banks
Date: 16:37:30 08/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 07, 2004 at 19:10:02, David Dahlem wrote: >On August 07, 2004 at 18:07:09, Graham Banks wrote: > >>On August 07, 2004 at 17:30:39, David Dahlem wrote: >> >>>On August 07, 2004 at 17:01:38, Graham Banks wrote: >>> >>>>Athlon XP2000 >>>>256mb hash each (or closest allowed by each program) >>>>3,4,5 piece tablebases >>>>All using Fritz Powerbook tournament book (maximum variety, minimum 5 games for >>>>a move to be played, no learning) >>>>40 moves in 40 minutes repeating. >>>>Ponder off >>>>Tournament run under Deep Fritz 8 GUI >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>STANDINGS (after 38 of 76 rounds) >>>> >>>>29.5 - CM9000 Judge II >>>>24.0 - List 512 >>>>23.5 - Gandalf 5.1 >>>>23.0 - SOS 4 >>>>22.5 - Thinker 4.6c >>>>22.5 - Rebel 12 >>>>22.0 - Pharaon 2.62 >>>>21.0 - CM 10th Edition (default) >>>>21.0 - Delfi 4.5 >>>>18.0 - Anaconda 1.6.2 >>>>18.0 - Deep Sjeng 1.6 >>>>18.0 - Tao 5.6 >>>>17.0 - Gothmog 1.0b10 >>>>16.5 - El Chinito 3.25 >>>>15.5 - Yace 0.99.87 >>>>15.0 - Crafty 19.15 >>>>14.5 - Little Goliath Revival >>>>13.5 - Fruit 1.5 >>>>13.5 - Slow Chess 2.93a >>>>11.5 - Comet B68 >>>> >>>>The top three programs apart from CM9000 Judge II and CM 10th Edition will play >>>>in the final stage of Super Tournament III at 40 moves in 120 minutes repeating. >>>> >>>>The games and crosstable should be up on Kurt’s website sometime soon. . >>>>http://www.utzingerk.com/banks/st_03_qual.htm >>>> >>>>I will now be replacing Rebel 12 with Pro Deo 1.0 and rerunning the first 38 >>>>games before proceeding into the second half of the tournament as I like to try >>>>and keep all current program versions in my tournament. >>>> >>>>Comments welcome. >>>>Graham. >>> >>>Hi Graham >>> >>>I really can't understand the poor showing of CM 10th Edition (default). For me, >>>it plays much stronger than this. :-) >>> >>>Regards >>>Dave >> >> >>Hi Dave, >>I don't think that CM 10th Edition will require as much tweaking as CM9000 in >>order to get stronger settings. I'd obviously put the selectivity up to 12 and >>I'd change the material values slightly. Apart from these, I can't see too many >>weak areas of play - maybe pawn weaknesses might need altering upwards? >>I'm very interested in the results you've had with CM 10th Edition (default) if >>you'd like to share them. >>Graham. > >Ok, here's a quick rundown according to EloStat. > > Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws > > 1 Shredder 8 : 2486 92 87 43 64.0% 2386 34.9% > 2 Shredder 7 : 2409 199 106 15 53.3% 2386 53.3% > 3 TheKing 3.33 : 2384 55 74 79 44.9% 2419 39.2% > 4 TheKing 3.23 : 2365 118 191 16 46.9% 2386 43.8% > 5 Ruffian Leiden : 2005 382 218 5 10.0% 2386 20.0% > >Regards >Dave What time control? And did you alter selectivity or is everything apart from hash at default settings? Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.