Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: in some cases humans are much better in tactics than computers

Author: Thomas Lagershausen

Date: 02:33:48 08/08/04

Go up one level in this thread


On August 07, 2004 at 18:14:59, Richard Pijl wrote:

>On August 07, 2004 at 08:51:51, Thomas Lagershausen wrote:
>
>>[D]3r2rk/3n1pp1/2p1b2p/3q3P/pp1PNQ2/2P2P2/PP6/KB4RR w - - 0 29
>>
>>In this speedchessgame in round two of the fide-wcc 2004 the IM Neelotpal
>>(2457)found with 29.Rg1-g6 !! with the thread to sacrifice the rook on h6 the
>>strongest move to show that white is not(!) worse in this position.
>>
>>I bet that every computer of the world wouldn´t have found this in a compareable
>>time.
>>
>>So this is a lesson in tactics where computers can learn form human players.
>>
>>Do you agree?
>>
>>TL
>
>Ready for a surprise?
>
>The Baron 1.4.0 selects Rg6 for the first time in 1:48 on a P4-2.4. It changes
>to Qe3 after 2:46, and finds Rg6 again after 3:59. So in order to win the bet I
>only need to find a faster computer :-). Baron doesn't see a win. But well, that
>wasn't part of the bet, was it?
>Richard.

No, it wasn´t. Amazing, i lost my bet against you. My luck that i don´t lose a
box of champagne. Congratulations to you. Only two questions:

What is the best hashsize for Baron on a Athlon 2200+ on tournamentlevel?

Will you release the version 1.40 for the community?

Best
Thomas



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.