Author: Tom Brake
Date: 12:33:48 08/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 08, 2004 at 15:07:11, Ed Trice wrote: >Sorry wrong position diagrammed first. It should be: > > > >1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. Bc4 g4 5. O-O gxf3 6. Qxf3 Qf6 > >[D]rnb1kbnr/pppp1p1p/5q2/8/2B1Pp2/5Q2/PPPP2PP/RNB2RK1 w - - > > > >>I find it interesting that certain chess engines (without books) seem to avoid >>inflicting additional punishment in aggressive tactical lines in the Muzio. >> >>example: >> >>1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. Bc4 g4 5. O-O gxf3 6. Qxf3 Qf6 >> >>[D]rnb1kbnr/pppp1p1p/5q2/4P3/2B2p2/5Q2/PPPP2PP/RNB2RK1 w - - >> >>White is down a knight, and programs seem to want to head for tranquility with >>7. d3 instead of the fireeworks: >> 7. d3 is the far superior move that gives white even chances. Saccing the 2nd piece isn't just not unclear, it's bad.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.