Author: Graham Banks
Date: 02:26:27 08/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 09, 2004 at 04:25:04, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On August 09, 2004 at 04:07:46, Graham Banks wrote: > >>On August 09, 2004 at 03:27:48, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On August 09, 2004 at 03:00:29, Sedat wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Sedat >>>>> A tight race between Shredder8 and Deep Fritz8. >>>>> Ruffian 2.1.0 and Rebel 12b9 are doing well too. >>>>> But still disappointing CM9_T05: we have never >>>>> seen this setting doing so badly. >>>>> Kurt [www.utzingerk.com] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Hello Kurt, >>>> >>>>But don't worry about CM9 T05-its only 31 games ! >>>>Maybe CM9 T05 did not like this time control,book... >>>> >>>>One thing more: >>>>-CM9 T05 played on a slower hardware in your tournament than mine and all >>>>engines played with 64 hashtable ! >>>> >>>>Best, >>>>Sedat >>> >>> Hi Sedat >>> I don't worry about CM9_T05 ... we all know that such >>> things can happen. But about one thing to mention: 256 MB >>> hash for The King is too much, please lower to 64 MB hash >>> and things will change -:) -:) >>> Kurt >> >> >>CM9000 Judge II is using 256mb hash in my tournament without any worries. >>Graham. > > Hi Graham > You and also Sedat seem to have overlooked my -:) -:) > Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com] I'm a bit blind at times Kurt. You should know that by now my friend! Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.