Author: blass uri
Date: 12:13:25 01/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 1999 at 14:15:47, Mark Young wrote: >On January 02, 1999 at 11:33:17, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On January 02, 1999 at 11:13:00, Dan Kiski wrote: >> >>>On January 02, 1999 at 03:57:37, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>>Fritz5 could win game 113 by 50.Ndc6 >>>>My Fritz5.16 finds this move in 59 seconds on pentium200MMX >>>> >>>>In the game Fritz5 had 81 seconds to use its permanent brain and to find the >>>>move on pentium400 but it could not find the move. >>>> >>>>Fritz5 used the permanent brain in this game(otherwise it would not play in 0 >>>>seconds) >>>> >>>>I know that Fritz5 is optimized for pentium200MMX but I think it does not say >>>>that Fritz5 is slower on pentium400 but only that it does not earn speed from >>>>pentium400 like other programs. >>>> >>>>The reason for this strange behavior of Fritz5 can be one of the following: >>>> >>>>1)Fritz5 was slowed down by another application or a virus >>>> >>>>I think that programs should tell the user if something like this happens. >>>>They can feel it if there is something strange in the number of nodes per second >>>> >>>>2)I have a different version of Fritz5(16 bit) >>>> >>>>3)Fritz5 got tired during the game because of a bug in Fritz5(It may be the >>>>case) >>>> >>>>I found that there were cases when Fritz5 was slowed down for some moves during >>>>a game against another engine. >>>>In most of the games it does not happen but it can happen. >>>> >>>>4)I used different hash tables(I do not think that this is the case because I >>>>tried different hash tables and it did not change the result of finding Ndc6 in >>>>1 minute) >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>Please post the fen or state which game this was. >>1n1N4/r1p5/5k2/3nN3/pp1P1P2/P5P1/3R1K1P/8 w - - 0 1 >>The last move of black was b5-b4 >>Fritz5 replied 50.Ra2 instead of Ndc6 >> >>The game can be found in Enrique's games (this is the 3th game between Fritz5 >>and tiger 11.7.5) > >I ran the position on my P II 400 256MB ram. I set the hash at 120 mb. > >5.03, Found Ndc6 45 sec. > >5.16 in Junior 5, Found Ndc6 in 30 sec. > >I let the position run 3 plus mins, it stayed with Ndc6. > >Did the move have a time stamp and ply number, that would help clear things up. ...b5 81 50.Ra2 1.25/10 0 Nc3... is written in enrique's pgn The evaluation of Fritz5.16 in Junior5 was1.25 only at depth 9 and at depth 10 it found Ndc6 Uri > >> >>Uri
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.