Author: Eran Karu
Date: 15:42:04 08/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 09, 2004 at 17:03:12, Eran Karu wrote:
>
>>41. Qd2 Rab7 {White's advantage has more or less
>>gone to the wind. The problem is the badly placed knight on g8; Der weisse
>>Vorteil hat sich mehr oder wenige in Luft aufgeloest, woran insbesondere der
>>schlecht platzierte Springer auf g8 schuldig ist}
>
>I think Pro Deo may not be good enough in long plan of strategy. Maybe I am
>wrong. Let's ask Ed Schroeder what he thinks.
>
>Eran Karu
Drb5r/3QN3/p3pp1k/8/N4P2/PPR1P1Pq/7P/6K1 w - - 0 38
AnMon plays sharp tactical chess and has no problems with rapid time-control. On
the other hand, Pro Deo is a knowledge-based program and plays positionally
better with longer time-control. Therefore, Pro Deo plays better if you give it
longer time-control or it plays on any faster computer with 3000 or more Mhz,
and Pro Deo would have a better chance to beat AnMon.
My computer: Pentium III 1000 Mhz
Each program took about 15 minutes of time analysis.
[Event "Positional Analysis by Pro Deo"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2004.08.10"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Pro Deo 1.0"]
[Black "AnMon 5.30"]
[Result "*"]
[Annotator "Karu,Eran"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "rb5r/3QN3/p3pp1k/8/N4P2/PPR1P1Pq/7P/6K1 w - - 0 38"]
[PlyCount "9"]
{Pro Deo 1.0:} 38. Rc6 Bxf4 39. Qxe6 Qxe6 40. Rxe6 Be5 41. Nb6 Rad8 42. Nc4 {
2.12/14} *
[Event "Positional Analysis by Fritz8"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2004.08.10"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Pro Deo 1.0"]
[Black "AnMon 5.30"]
[Result "*"]
[Annotator "Karu,Eran"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "rb5r/3QN3/p3pp1k/8/N4P2/PPR1P1Pq/7P/6K1 w - - 0 38"]
[PlyCount "11"]
{Fritz 8:} 38. Qd3 Qg4 39. Rc6 Bxf4 40. Qd4 Kg7 41. Qxf4 Qe2 42. Qf2 Qd1+ 43.
Qf1 {2.34/15} *
Eran Karu
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.