Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Pro Deo 1.0 vs AnMon 5.30 (40'/40) 0-1 (where is the fault?)

Author: Hristo

Date: 20:47:27 08/09/04

Go up one level in this thread

On August 09, 2004 at 22:03:47, Mark Young wrote:

>On August 09, 2004 at 18:13:06, Hristo wrote:
>
>>On August 09, 2004 at 15:37:33, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>
>>>An interesting game in which it looked as if Pro Deo 1.0 would
>>>win. But Ed Schröder's program missed somewhere the win and later
>>>avoided the draw.
>>
>>33. Rxd7+
>>seems to be better than the 33. Qe7+
>>
>>[D]rbN3r1/3R1k2/p3pp2/4n2q/NQ6/PPR1P1P1/5P1P/6K1 b - -
>>
>>Is it not?
>>
>>Regards,
>>Hristo
>
>If you would have read what Kurt posted. You will see he already thinks it is
>better.

But I didn't and came up with the same conclusion after going through the game
by hand.

>
>"33. Rxd7+ Nxd7 34. Qe7+ Kg6 35. Qxd7 {was stronger but strange: in
>the analysis mode Pro Deo 1.0 would always play 33.Rxd7;"

• Re: Pro Deo 1.0 vs AnMon 5.30 (40'/40) 0-1 (where is the fault?) Mark Young 22:10:45 08/09/04
  • Re: Pro Deo 1.0 vs AnMon 5.30 (40'/40) 0-1 (where is the fault?) Hristo 22:33:12 08/09/04
    • Re: Pro Deo 1.0 vs AnMon 5.30 (40'/40) 0-1 (where is the fault?) Mark Young 22:42:47 08/09/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.