Author: Mark Young
Date: 22:10:45 08/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 09, 2004 at 23:47:27, Hristo wrote:
>On August 09, 2004 at 22:03:47, Mark Young wrote:
>
>>On August 09, 2004 at 18:13:06, Hristo wrote:
>>
>>>On August 09, 2004 at 15:37:33, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>>
>>>>An interesting game in which it looked as if Pro Deo 1.0 would
>>>>win. But Ed Schröder's program missed somewhere the win and later
>>>>avoided the draw.
>>>
>>>33. Rxd7+
>>>seems to be better than the 33. Qe7+
>>>
>>>[D]rbN3r1/3R1k2/p3pp2/4n2q/NQ6/PPR1P1P1/5P1P/6K1 b - -
>>>
>>>Is it not?
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Hristo
>>
>>If you would have read what Kurt posted. You will see he already thinks it is
>>better.
>
>But I didn't and came up with the same conclusion after going through the game
>by hand.
I know. So you wasted your time looking at the same position, and asking a
question that is answered in the original post. Not very productive :)
>
>>
>>"33. Rxd7+ Nxd7 34. Qe7+ Kg6 35. Qxd7 {was stronger but strange: in
>>the analysis mode Pro Deo 1.0 would always play 33.Rxd7;"
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.