Author: Johan Havegheer
Date: 11:26:05 08/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 09, 2004 at 15:37:33, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>An interesting game in which it looked as if Pro Deo 1.0 would
>win. But Ed Schröder's program missed somewhere the win and later
>avoided the draw. AnMon punished this a realized the full point.
>Below a trial to comment this game.
>
>In einer spannenden Partie sah es vorerst so aus, als ob Pro Deo
>Gewinnstellung erreicht hätte. Doch irgendwo verpasste es dann das
>Programm von Ed Schröder, den Vorteil heimzufahren. Und statt Remis
>zu machen, ginge die Partie schliesslich noch in die Hosen. Unten
>der Versuch einer Kommentierung:
>
>[Event "AnMon530_PDeo10 Dur 1.3/64 40'/40"]
>[Site "Dur 1.3/64"]
>[Date "2004.08.03"]
>[Round "2"]
>[White "Pro Deo 1.0"]
>[Black "AnMon5.30"]
>[Result "0-1"]
>[ECO "D45"]
>[Annotator "Utzinger,K"]
>[PlyCount "112"]
>
>1. d4 {Fritz8-GUI, Duron 1.3/256 MB, AnMon 64 MB hash, Pro Deo 40 MB hash with
>default style, ponder=off, time control 40'/40+40'/40+40', both 5moves.ctg
>book}
Kurt,
Have you looked at the time used per move by pro deo after move 40 ??
Did he use 1sec/move after move 40 ?
Seems to go wrong in CB-Gui's when using 3 time limits ?!?
Best
Johan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.