Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 17:17:03 01/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 1998 at 19:47:37, greg moller wrote: >On December 31, 1998 at 14:02:13, Marc van Hal wrote: > >>I was forgotten to tell that the booklearning option starts to say that an >>intire opening is bad and didnt look at all subvariation first so it should only >>lock an subvariation and try an other line perhaps the mainline is not the best >>after all > > >Wouldn't it be great if somebody could post a definitive report on how book >learning is really supposed to work, and somehow compare a few programs' >learning features ? > >For example Mchess has both book learning and "regular" learning... now what's >the difference, and does it really work as it's supposed to ? And where exactly >does a program's learning aftereffect actually kick in, i.e. at which point do >you discard a branch? In fritz5 book learning seems to gradually eliminate a lot >of the early replies until you're left with one move ( let's say 1.c4) which >then gets played over an over, unless you reset, which does, to an extent, >defeat the purpose of any real learning. This seems very crude. Hopefully >someone can point to a more intelligent learning feature. I think it's a >fascinating subject. > > >regards, greg Hi greg I today recieved Nimzo99 a program wich has also a learning options for the engine aswell as the book and nice but treu is this was also what i wrote under the openingsbooks options you can give the option on how many times an openingsline should be played before it would change the book exactly what my point was the date is now 03-01-1999
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.