Author: Frank E. Oldham
Date: 14:57:18 08/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 10, 2004 at 16:59:55, Ricardo Rego wrote: >Hi > >I heard from a plenty number of guys at Go schools (Nihon Ki-in) & Go Forums >that "chess has been more or less 'solved' as a programming problem". Indeed, >they provided me the following link, where a gentlemen explains why computers >can't play Go: http://www.cns.nyu.edu/~mechner/compgo/sciences/ > >Someone says "Go is totally intuition, on the other hand, chess is totally >tactics"... and so on and so for. > >Ok, I am a Chess lover and I like to play Go, as well, but I cannot see how >programming Go programs can be more dificult than Chess. > >What is your opinion about that ? > >TIA, Ricardo Mechner's article is a good overview -- the main reason is that no one knows how to program a good "evaluation function" for the leaf nodes of the search tree. Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.