Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: c,c++5,c#.

Author: Tord Romstad

Date: 03:17:17 08/12/04

Go up one level in this thread

On August 11, 2004 at 18:38:38, Anthony Cozzie wrote:

>Then, we have C++, which tries to make a high level language out of a low level
>language.  Guess what? it _doesn't work_.  It is an exercise in stupidity.
>There are two ways to write C++: you can write it as C with a few nice syntax
>features to clean up your code, or you can (as you are evidently advocating)
>write it as an attempted high level language. The only problem with this is that
>you will fail miserably, because you still have to do your own memory
>management, etc.  So you end up with the same development time as C and the same
>speed as a high level language.

Very well said.  This is almost exactly how I feel about C++ myself.

Tord

• Re: c,c++5,c#. Daniel Clausen 07:59:33 08/12/04
  • Re: c,c++5,c#. Anthony Cozzie 08:18:56 08/12/04
    • Re: c,c++5,c#. Bo Persson 10:40:29 08/12/04
      • Re: c,c++5,c#. Dan Andersson 12:45:31 08/12/04

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.