Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Verified Null-moving

Author: Anthony Cozzie

Date: 06:25:11 08/12/04

Go up one level in this thread

On August 12, 2004 at 07:33:23, Tor Lattimore wrote:

>Testing with WAC it seems to make very little difference between R=3, R=2 or R=3
>with verrification, even thought the average ply difference is quite different.
>This leads me to think that R=2 or adaptive based on remaining ply is probobly
>my best bet, but I think i'll do some longer time control tests to see if that
>makes a difference.

Pure R=3 only works for people that do checks in Q-search.

Examples: Zappa, Gothmog (although tord plays games with his R), and I think


This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.