Author: Anthony Cozzie
Date: 06:34:38 08/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 12, 2004 at 08:01:49, Tord Romstad wrote: >On August 11, 2004 at 15:33:20, Bo Persson wrote: > >>On August 11, 2004 at 05:22:51, Tord Romstad wrote: >> >>> >>>I also prefer to partition my source code into many small files, where each >>>file contains just a small number of closely related functions. I don't see >>>what this has to do with classes. It seems like to completely unrelated >>>issues to me. >> >>This might be your problem. :-) >> >>If you put your "closely related functions", together with the small amount of >>data they work on, in a small structure - there you've got your class! > >And the only practical difference compared to using structs and functions >with these structs (or pointers to them) as arguments is that I forced >to use the x.y() syntax rather than the y(x) syntax which I like so much >better. > >As long as I don't need inheritance or functions which behave differently >depending on the type of their arguments, I don't see why I would want >classes. > >Tord I actually don't mind the x.y() syntax, except when people go overboard and start creating code like x.GetInterleavedMemoryPagesWithLocking(). I really can't stand the Java/MS alternating caps naming convention. I am going to try your indenting style a bit though, and see how I like it. anthony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.