Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Verified Null-moving

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 08:10:58 08/12/04

Go up one level in this thread

On August 12, 2004 at 09:25:11, Anthony Cozzie wrote:

>On August 12, 2004 at 07:33:23, Tor Lattimore wrote:
>>Testing with WAC it seems to make very little difference between R=3, R=2 or R=3
>>with verrification, even thought the average ply difference is quite different.
>>This leads me to think that R=2 or adaptive based on remaining ply is probobly
>>my best bet, but I think i'll do some longer time control tests to see if that
>>makes a difference.
>Pure R=3 only works for people that do checks in Q-search.
>Examples: Zappa, Gothmog (although tord plays games with his R), and I think

You can add Movei that use usually R=3 and does checks in the qsearch.


This page took 0.03 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.