Author: Alessandro Scotti
Date: 09:28:43 08/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 12, 2004 at 12:23:01, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote: >Is there proof that Pro Deo can play endgames better than an engine using >Nalimov or Thompson tablebases ? > >A. Ponti This was discussed not too long ago in a thread named: "Re: Ed have you..... Repost the last fell off the end of the board>>>>", which is still available in the "other" page. IIRC, Pro Deo already knows how to play very well the most common endgames and wouldn't gain too much from tablebases (with 5 pieces or less).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.