Author: Anthony Cozzie
Date: 08:55:12 08/13/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 13, 2004 at 02:12:04, Aaron Gordon wrote: >All the bad press finally got him redo the review. I told'em a few cflags he >could use to make performance better.. unfortunately he didn't do the PGO >optimization. I think he thought because I said I used GCC 3.4.1 that it was >only available in 3.4.1, who knows.. > >Anyway, looks like the 64bit stuff on the Nacona offers no performance benefit >(only addressing). Would fit with the rumors I heard a few months back. We'll >see I guess. Supposedly they just "got it working" for now and will fix the >performance issue later. > >Anyone know any hard facts about the 64bit Xeon stuff? Broken? I thought Nocona was an implementation of of AMD64 ? anthony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.