Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 00:56:35 08/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 2004 at 01:13:20, Graham Banks wrote:
>Athlon XP2000
>256mb hash each (or closest allowed by each program)
>3,4,5 piece tablebases
>All using Fritz Powerbook tournament book (maximum variety, minimum 5 games for
>a move to be played, no learning)
>40 moves in 40 minutes repeating.
>Ponder off
>Tournament run under Deep Fritz 8 GUI
>
>
>
>STANDINGS (after 42 of 76 rounds)
>
>32.0 - CM9000 Judge II
>26.0 - List 512
>25.5 - CM 10th Edition (default)
>25.5 - SOS 4
>25.0 - Gandalf 5.1
>24.5 - Pharaon 2.62
>24.5 - Thinker 4.6c
>23.5 - Delfi 4.5
>23.5 - Pro Deo 1.0
>21.0 - Anaconda 1.6.2
>20.5 - Tao 5.6
>20.0 - Deep Sjeng 1.6
>20.0 - Gothmog 1.0b10
>18.5 - Yace 0.99.87
>16.5 - Fruit 1.5
>16.0 - El Chinito 3.25
>15.0 - Little Goliath Revival
>15.0 - Crafty 19.15
>14.0 - Comet B68
>13.5 - Slow Chess 2.93a
>
>
>
>The games and crosstable should be up on Kurt’s website sometime soon.
>http://www.utzingerk.com/banks/st_03_qual.htm
>
>Comments welcome.
>Graham.
Hi Graham
Games and crosstable are updated on my website.
Some remarks to your fine qualifying tournament.
CM9_Judge_II: to test this setting is a must as
soon as I find time to do this. List512 second
is no surprise for this very strong engine. However,
the third place for SOS 4 for Arena could not expected
in advance in my opinion. And 4th rank for CM10k shows
that the default settings of the new engine could indeed
be better than those of CM9k. Gandalf51 a surprise to
me but I have to admit that I have no experience with
the Danish engine. Pharao 2.62 still too good in your
tourney and I think ranking will drop later. Very well
doing is Thinker 4.6c but the same thing can be said
in our AT 2004 [http://www.utzingerk.com/at_2004.htm]
Delfi 4.5 and Pro Deo 1.0 have a score of more than
50 % and it's hard to say if these engines will climb
or fall in the coming rounds. A great difference between
our tournaments is the behaviour of Crafty 19.15: 56 %
to 35 %. The remaining engines will surely try to improve
their situation, in particular Deep Sjeng 1.6 can do
better.
Kind regards
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.