Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 03:44:48 08/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 2004 at 05:37:53, Graham Banks wrote:
>Thanks for your thoughts Kurt and also thanks for hosting my tournaments on your
>website.
>I wonder how much influence the 256mb hash is having on some of these programs
>and whether or not this could explain the unexpectedly strong performances of
>some. SOS 4 and Pharaon 2.62 come to mind here.
>I agree with you that the default settings of CM 10th Edition are more balanced
>and stronger than the CM9000 ones. I'll be upping the selectivity setting for CM
>10th Edition in the final stage of Super Tournament III. I guess 12 would be
>best?
>Graham.
Hi Graham
Too early for me to give a recommendation for CM10k and
selectivity. I am still busy testing the default settings
at 40'/40 [http://www.utzingerk.com/cm10k.htm] and the
only results I have with sel=12 is a 4-8 win vs Junior8
and a 4,5-8,5 loss vs Hiarcs9. Of course: much too less
games played so far with CM10k sel=12.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.