Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 07:36:14 08/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
This was wrongly posted as a reply -- must not be awake yet. If the moderator reads this, can he either delete it or move it off to another thread. Thanks. On August 15, 2004 at 10:34:10, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >Okay I'll do one more test of SEE after this and then I'm done >with formal SEE testing, though I don't know if I can include it >without some depth condition. Seems to me it only works for >deep searches so perhaps I should just use it if depth > 6 or >something. > >Test tests 300 positions with no see, see >= 0, delta/futility prune, >and both. There is slightly more depth with see>=0 (10.19 vs. 10.01.) > >My next test will be to use see to sort capture moves by adding >the see score to the mvv/lva score. Likewise, I will not recalculate >the see score (since it was already calculated during the scoring >of the move within the addmove routine) when I use it in the quiescence. > >This is why my see use within move sorting was not added optimally. >I was recalculating see in a 2nd place. Two calls to see for the same >position -- I'll make the new run for SEESORT tonight. > >Since each additional item to test expands the total test time >(with NOSEE, SEEQUIESCE, DELTAPRUNE, SEEQUIESCE+SEEDELTA, I have >to test 4 things but adding SEESORT I'll have to test SEEQUIESCE+SEESORT >DELTAPRUNE+SEESORT, SEEQUIESCE+SEEDELTA+SEESORT.) So at least only >3 to test tonight instead of 4. Each run is about 2 hours (7100 seconds >4th column below) at 30 seconds per position. > >Stuart > >$ ./qaNbatch >HERALD ga nosee30300.log 30 300 >**** 10.01/35.43 86% 259/300 7185.97 1762949376 5876498/24/245332 0/0/103274328/ >0/0/0 >HERALD ga -DSEEQUIESCE seequiesce30300.log 30 300 >**** 10.19/31.80 87% 261/300 7153.01 1574976128 5249920/24/220184 0/0/51018488/0 >/0/0 >HERALD ga -DDELTAPRUNE seedelta30300.log 30 300 >**** 10.00/35.40 86% 259/300 7188.23 1749075840 5830253/24/243325 0/0/102505680/ >0/0/0 >HERALD ga -DSEEQUIESCE -DDELTAPRUNE seeboth.log 30 300 >**** 10.19/31.81 87% 261/300 7153.72 1575198848 5250663/24/220193 0/0/51030984/0 >/0/0
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.