Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:13:59 08/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 2004 at 12:01:56, Andrew Platt wrote: >Do not underestimate the cost of writing to Windows terminals! Particularly if >the output is unbuffered it can be quite intense. Try this: Open a file as a >test and send the output to there (default buffering of fopen is fine). See if >you see the same slowdown. > >Andy. It cannot be the cost of writing because the difference between times when there is no additional writing is also significantly bigger. I do not understand what is unbuffered output. I use fflush(stdout) after every printf but I know that I need to use fflush(stdout) after lines that I print (otherwise the program may work in text mode but not under winboard) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.