Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ProDeo parameter [King Safety] and [King_Safety]

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 10:31:13 08/15/04

Go up one level in this thread


On August 15, 2004 at 12:59:58, David Dahlem wrote:

>On August 15, 2004 at 11:34:47, Ed Schröder wrote:
>
>>On August 15, 2004 at 09:51:52, Werner Schuele wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Ed,
>>>when I use king_safety parameter, what happens with King Safety ?
>>>Can i write then [King Safety ? 150] instead ??
>>>Werner
>>
>>[King_Safety] is a replacement of [King Safety].
>>
>>The replacement is expected somewhat better as it razors some out of
>>proportional evaluation scores.
>>
>>My best,
>>
>>Ed
>
>Hi Ed
>
>I'm confused. If [King_Safety] is better than [King Safety], why is it disabled
>in the parameter list on this page?
>
>http://members.home.nl/matador/engine.htm
>
>And why is [King_Safety] not even included in the default rebel.eng included in
>the Pro Deo download? Is it a new parameter developed since the download was
>made available?


I choose my words careful and said "expected somewhat better". In this case it
means that that [King_Safety] feels good but that it hasn't played one serious
game yet.

Hope this clarifies.

My best,

Ed




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.