Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ProDeo parameter [King Safety] and [King_Safety]

Author: David Dahlem

Date: 10:56:55 08/15/04

Go up one level in this thread


On August 15, 2004 at 13:31:13, Ed Schröder wrote:

>On August 15, 2004 at 12:59:58, David Dahlem wrote:
>
>>On August 15, 2004 at 11:34:47, Ed Schröder wrote:
>>
>>>On August 15, 2004 at 09:51:52, Werner Schuele wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi Ed,
>>>>when I use king_safety parameter, what happens with King Safety ?
>>>>Can i write then [King Safety ? 150] instead ??
>>>>Werner
>>>
>>>[King_Safety] is a replacement of [King Safety].
>>>
>>>The replacement is expected somewhat better as it razors some out of
>>>proportional evaluation scores.
>>>
>>>My best,
>>>
>>>Ed
>>
>>Hi Ed
>>
>>I'm confused. If [King_Safety] is better than [King Safety], why is it disabled
>>in the parameter list on this page?
>>
>>http://members.home.nl/matador/engine.htm
>>
>>And why is [King_Safety] not even included in the default rebel.eng included in
>>the Pro Deo download? Is it a new parameter developed since the download was
>>made available?
>
>
>I choose my words careful and said "expected somewhat better". In this case it
>means that that [King_Safety] feels good but that it hasn't played one serious
>game yet.
>
>Hope this clarifies.
>
>My best,
>
>Ed

Thanks Ed. All clear now. :-)

Regards
Dave



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.