Author: Mathieu Pagé
Date: 16:31:18 08/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 2004 at 18:58:06, Bruce Cleaver wrote: >What if the optimal value is 2.5? > >At any rate, any value you plug in would need experimental justification. The >search savings just might overcome the blunder rate, just like the integer >values. Hi Bruce, You're right in this case you'll have the experiment, but i'm sure whatever you do you're experiment will tell you 2 is better that 3, or the inverse(3 better than 2). I can not see how an radom value of R would be any better. Mathieu P.
This page took 0.21 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.