Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 01:41:03 08/22/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 21, 2004 at 18:21:23, chandler yergin wrote:
>On August 21, 2004 at 18:01:43, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>
>>English:
>>
>>Against the Morra Gambit should the book authors of more thoughts make
>>themselves!
>>
>>Which uses 1... c5!?, if knows with 2. d4!? answers and the book leaves a
>>little later.
>>If I played 100 games as whiter against different programs + original book with
>>the Morra Gambit, I have a weapon into the hand for programs to crack only with
>>difficulty am. Reason: In the books too few variants are located, and those
>>can be Knock out easily. And if in such a way black the Morra Gambit rejects to
>>control (e.g. with d5) has one as whiter enough alternatives around the center
>>and make draw at least. Against Fritz 8 I did not have problems with the Morra
>>Gambit, and Shredder 7,04 did not look here good:
>>
>>German:
>>
>>Gegen das Morra Gambit sollten sich die Buchautoren mehr Gedanken machen!
>>
>>Was nützt 1...c5!?, wenn weiß mit 2. d4!? antwortet und wenig später das Buch
>>Verlässt. Wenn ich 100 Partien als weißer gegen verschiedene Programme +
>>Original Buch mit dem Morra-Gambit gespielt habe, habe ich eine Waffe in den
>>Hand die für Programme
>>Nur noch schwer zu knacken ist. Grund: In den Büchern stehen zu wenige
>>Varianten, und die lassen sich leicht ausknocken. Und wenn schwarz das
>>Morra-Gambit ablehnt, (z. B. mit d5) so hat man als weißer genug Alternativen um
>>das Zentrum zu kontrollieren und mindestens Remis zu machen..
>>
>>Gegen Fritz 8 hatte ich mit dem Morra-Gambit keine Probleme, und Shredder 7.04
>>sah hier nicht gut aus:
>>
>>[Event "Blitz:30'"]
>>[Site "Privat"]
>>[Date "2004.08.21"]
>>[Round "?"]
>>[White "Nemeth, Eduard"]
>>[Black "Shredder 7.04"]
>>[Result "1-0"]
>>[ECO "B21"]
>>[Annotator "Nemeth,Eduard"]
>>[PlyCount "85"]
>>[TimeControl "1800"]
>>
>>{64MB, Shredder7.ctg, P3 600} 1. e4 {0} c5 {0} 2. d4 {(Sf3) 2} cxd4 {0} 3. c3 {
>>2} dxc3 {0} 4. Nxc3 {2} Nc6 {0} 5. Nf3 {8} d6?? {0}
5...e6 is stronger as d6 will not be forced later...
>>6. Bc4 {5} e6 {0} 7. Bf4 {4} Nf6 {0} 8. Qe2 {3} a6 {0} 9. Rd1! {(0-0) 4} b5 >>{0.19/11 22} 10. Bb3 {82} b4?! (even 10...Bb7 or 10...Be7 leave white in >>advantage)
Very good!
Ciao
Sandro
>>{0.70/12 26} 11. Nd5 {(Sa4) 22} Bb7 {0.53/10 52} 12. e5 (Sxf6+) >>31} Nxd5 {-1.49/11 39} 13. Bxd5 {4} exd5 {-1.38/12 39} 14. exd6+ {4} Kd7 {->>1.38/13 70}
>>15. O-O {(Txd5) 63} Qf6 {-0.81/12 68} 16. Qe3 {73} d4 {-0.25/12 35} 17. Nxd4 {9
>>} Nxd4 {-0.25/13 57} 18. Rxd4 {5} Re8 {0.53/12 145} 19. Qd2 {8} Qf5 {0.60/9 4}
>>20. Rc1 {8} Rc8 {1.41/10 36} 21. Rxc8 {34} Bxc8 {1.41/11 11} 22. Qc1 {13} Bb7 {
>>1.30/10 24} 23. Qc7+ {23} Ke6 {2.20/11 89} 24. f3 {14} g5 {2.20/11 38} 25. g4 {
>>43} Qb1+ {1.95/11 0} 26. Bc1 {17} Kf6 {2.13/9 9} 27. Rd1 {28} Kg7 {4.13/12 32}
>>28. Qxb7 {15} Bxd6 {4.23/13 23} 29. Qd5 {2} Be7 {4.35/12 38} 30. Bxg5 {31}
>>Qxd1+ {4.35/14 0} 31. Qxd1 {2} Bxg5 {4.58/14 34} 32. Qd4+ {2} Bf6 {4.62/14 16}
>>33. Qxb4 {2} Rc8 {4.62/13 43} 34. Qd2 {2} Rd8 {4.86/11 22} 35. Qc1 {(Da5) 21}
>>Re8 {4.71/10 23} 36. b4 {24} Bd4+ {4.99/11 0} 37. Kf1 {(Kh1) 5} Re3 {5.06/12 33
>>} 38. Qd2 {(Dc4) 57} Rxf3+ {3.82/17 79} 39. Kg2 {3} Rf2+ {4.07/17 56} 40. Qxf2
>>{4} Bxf2 {4.30/19 49} 41. Kxf2 {3} Kf6 {7.55/20 282} 42. a4 {(Kg3) 74} Ke6 {
>>9.92/19 179} 43. Kf3 {(b5) 6} 1-0
>>
>>After move 12 white:
>>
>>Nemeth,E - Shredder 7.04, Blitz:30'
>>
>>[D]r2qkb1r/1b3ppp/p1nppn2/3NP3/1p3B2/1B3N2/PP2QPPP/3RK2R b Kkq - 0 1
>
>In the Church's Fried Chicken Tournament in 1972..
>The Morra Gambit did not fare well either.
>;)
>Ken Smith was left in the dust..
>CY
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.