Author: Jonas Bylund
Date: 10:40:26 08/22/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 22, 2004 at 11:47:03, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 22, 2004 at 11:34:25, Jonas Bylund wrote: > >>>Bob claims that even if Elchinito is not a clone then it is clear that Elchinito >>>copied large chunks of Crafty and it is not allowed to do it(or in bob's words >>>not a permissable activity). >> >>You mean that he thought the evidence _presented_, suggested that atleast >>chunk's if not all where used. > >Your sentence is most of what I meant. > >The only missing parts are > >1)Bob used the word *large* chunks and not only the word chunks. >2)Bob made it clear that it is not a permissable activity. > >Uri My point was you said that, i quote "Bob claims that even if Elchinito is not a clone then it is clear that Elchinito..." He wrote that whatever he based his opinion on was the evidence he was _presented_ with, the way you wrote it, you made it sound as if Bob had said _he_ based his claim on his own investigation and not someone elses findings. Just wanted to avaiod a lot of "Bob said this and that etc..."
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.