Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:49:23 08/22/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 22, 2004 at 13:40:26, Jonas Bylund wrote: >On August 22, 2004 at 11:47:03, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 22, 2004 at 11:34:25, Jonas Bylund wrote: >> >>>>Bob claims that even if Elchinito is not a clone then it is clear that Elchinito >>>>copied large chunks of Crafty and it is not allowed to do it(or in bob's words >>>>not a permissable activity). >>> >>>You mean that he thought the evidence _presented_, suggested that atleast >>>chunk's if not all where used. >> >>Your sentence is most of what I meant. >> >>The only missing parts are >> >>1)Bob used the word *large* chunks and not only the word chunks. >>2)Bob made it clear that it is not a permissable activity. >> >>Uri > >My point was you said that, i quote "Bob claims that even if Elchinito is not a >clone then it is clear that Elchinito..." He wrote that whatever he based his >opinion on was the evidence he was _presented_ with, the way you wrote it, you >made it sound as if Bob had said _he_ based his claim on his own investigation >and not someone elses findings. Just wanted to avaiod a lot of "Bob said this >and that etc..." I understand but I understood that he based his claim not only on something that someone else said(after all some liar can say the same thing about Ruffian and it will simply be a lie and if he used the word evidence then I understand that he verified that someone else findings were correct). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.