Author: Lance Perkins
Date: 18:21:06 08/22/04
Go up one level in this thread
I heard that whatever evidence you present does not count. We need to contact the author. Only the source code from him and his confession can tell us whether its a clone or not. Your reverse engineering does not count. Is it only _parts_ of the Arasan 7.4 code that was cloned by 8.0? I heard that does not count either. It has to be 100%. Your big chunk 50% claim is irrelevant. I suggest you wait for Bob. After you hear from Bob, it still won't count. It has to be 100%. Are you trying to discredit Jon? Hehe. I'm only humoring too... Chill out. You started this. On August 22, 2004 at 19:23:17, Tom Likens wrote: >On August 22, 2004 at 18:03:13, Jon Dart wrote: > >>On August 22, 2004 at 17:54:27, Tom Likens wrote: >> >> >>>Any idea how much stronger version 8.0 is compared to the previous >>>version? >> >>I think it's better but I haven't run any large cross-version test >>matches. >> >>This version beats Phalanx pretty regularly now, which past versions >>have had difficulty doing. >> >>--Jno > >Thanks Jon, > >Unfortunately, I've just compared the code between Arasan 8.0 and your >previous version and I can only conclude that Arasan 8.0 is a clone of >Arasan 7.4!! Of course, I can supply any evidence you require! :-) ;-) > >Sorry, sorry- I just couldn't resist, sometimes my warped sense of humor >simply overwhelms my better judgement, (frankly, my wife believes I am >beyond hope, but that is another thread altogether). > >best regards, >--tom > >P.S. And good luck in WBEC 2nd division.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.