Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: AT 2004 (90m+30s) Replacement of El Chinito 3.25? (To Ed Schroeder)

Author: Kurt Utzinger

Date: 02:27:22 08/23/04

Go up one level in this thread


On August 23, 2004 at 05:17:08, Odd Gunnar Malin wrote:

>On August 23, 2004 at 04:51:00, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On August 23, 2004 at 04:48:41, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>>
>>>On August 23, 2004 at 04:43:57, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>>
>>>>After the rumours here in CCC about El Chinito being
>>>>a Crafty clone, we are wondering whether we should
>>>>replace El Chinito 3.25 by Delfi 4.5. What's your
>>>>opinion on that? [http://www.utzingerk.com/at_2004.htm]
>>>>Kurt
>>>
>>>Why can´t you replace it by Pro Deo 1.0?
>>>
>>>Oh I see, it´s a clone of Rebel :)
>>>
>>>Michael
>>
>>
>>      Hi Michael
>>      Pro Deo 1.0 does not support the time
>>      control 90m+30s chosen in our tourney.
>>      Kurt
>
>Is this something new?
>I have not got the time to test ProDeo but Rebel works with this timecontrol and
>I see in ProDeo's ini-file that it still should works.
>
>Odd Gunnar


     Hi Odd Gunnar
     At [http://members.home.nl/matador/prodeo.htm] Ed Schroeder
     stated the following regarding time control:
     "Under ChessBase and perhaps other Interfaces such as Arena,
     ChessMaster, Winboard a time-control problem may or may not occur.
     Using the tournament time control make sure that time-control-1 is
     equal to time-control-2 and that you zero time-control-3. So:
     40/2hr+40/2hr or 40/20+40/20. Doing otherwise it may happen PRO
     DEO will start moving instantly after move 41 for the rest of the game."
     Does this mean that time controls like 90m+30s works in Pro Deo?
     I am somewhat irritated.
     Kurt


Check out the PRO DEO FAQ for more information.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.