Author: Peter Berger
Date: 05:18:25 08/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 23, 2004 at 06:47:34, Matthias Gemuh wrote: >On August 23, 2004 at 04:43:57, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>After the rumours here in CCC about El Chinito being >>a Crafty clone, we are wondering whether we should >>replace El Chinito 3.25 by Delfi 4.5. What's your >>opinion on that? [http://www.utzingerk.com/at_2004.htm] >>Kurt > > > >Hi Kurt, >I am disappointed that you don't differentiate between perfect proofs >and rumours. That discredits the wonderful work of Paul H. in this case. >Best, >Matthias. That's not reasonable, Matthias. For an ordinary user of chessprograms a baseless accuse and a perfect proof will look very similar, if presented in a similar way. For example a non-programmer might be able to judge whether a conclusion supports the accuse of cloning, but not if the conclusion itself is correct. Just think of a perfect proof in Suaheli :) Peter Peter
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.