Author: Peter Berger
Date: 07:06:27 08/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 23, 2004 at 09:34:06, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >So, what you here basically miss is this: in an expert environment something has >been proven and we have one or two who can't believe it, also because they don't >understand what Paul had discovered. But that's exactly the "problem", Rolf. For example you don't understand the potential proof either, but it would not be reasonable if someone were disappointed about it IMHO, which was my point. You are right that there are others who can, but those who can't, can't judge, other than choosing to believe in conclusions others reached. The only thing an ordinary user can do is look if the statements themselves seem to make sense and sound logical, but you can't evaluate the assembler statements e.g., and if tomorrow someone else posted another explanation which is coherent, you wouldn't know who is right. So a baseless accuse and a perfect proof will look alike to you too - q.e.d.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.