Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 07:17:59 08/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 23, 2004 at 10:06:27, Peter Berger wrote: > >On August 23, 2004 at 09:34:06, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>So, what you here basically miss is this: in an expert environment something has >>been proven and we have one or two who can't believe it, also because they don't >>understand what Paul had discovered. > >But that's exactly the "problem", Rolf. For example you don't understand the >potential proof either, but it would not be reasonable if someone were >disappointed about it IMHO, which was my point. You are right that there are >others who can, but those who can't, can't judge, other than choosing to believe >in conclusions others reached. The only thing an ordinary user can do is look if >the statements themselves seem to make sense and sound logical, but you can't >evaluate the assembler statements e.g., and if tomorrow someone else posted >another explanation which is coherent, you wouldn't know who is right. So a >baseless accuse and a perfect proof will look alike to you too - q.e.d. Good try. Look, you simply miss the environment here. If something were wrong, someone would write it. For sure. This is what you can't believe I think. But this is how it works everywhere in science. In such an almost trivial situation, where also Bob gave his Yes, Frank and you remain in doubts. Fine, but absolutely in vain. You confuse the logic here. It is not the problem if some lays can't follow the decisions. This is not open to democratic votings either! It has been proven that Chinito is partly stolen from Crafty. This is all what we need to know. Not how exactly the proof had been done. Or that perhaps tomorrow someone could prove that the verdict is false. This is impossible - logically. So, one looks really stupid if one says, ok, this was Bob live, but wait a minute I'll have to hear what Eugenio has to say. That is for Frank but not a possibility for you. Even from Frank I would have expected that he said: shit happens, this is really a sad moment, but you will understand that I must also hear what my partner has to say. But all that couldn't change the situation. ElChinito is partly out of Crafty. And more it has been found out that the programmer is so stupid as to import also nonsense code from Crafty - so this is exactly the final item we needed. Because nobody really smart would make such a bad copy. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.