Author: Gerd Isenberg
Date: 17:29:15 08/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 23, 2004 at 17:41:38, Matthias Gemuh wrote: > > >> >>Such "standard" code like NextMove is IMHO not sufficent to proof El Chinito as >>Crafty clone. Did i missed something? >> >>BTW. Is it legal to disassembly others executables? >> > > > >Hi Gerd, >Is "such standard code like NextMove" also implemented the same way in your >engine, IsiChess ? Are the Crafty evaluation functions in ElChinito also >standard and in IsiChess ? Are the reported Crafty bugs in ElChinito also >standard and present in IsiChess ? That IsiChess has a complete other movegen does not proof, that El Chinitos getMove is a copy of Crafty, even if it is likely, due to the other point with eval and the 99999 compare. I admit that i copied some source code here from CCC via clipboard into my program, for instance kogge-stone algorithms. The same might be true for others, and the intention i and others post source-code here is to share it and to get a feedback, improvements and other ideas. Is Crafty's getMove-code really so unique and some code snippets got never posted here? If i implement some quicksort from some published pseudo code, it is not unlikely that i get the same assembly, despite other identifiers. >You create the impression that the ElChinito guy is the one doing the right >thing and Paul H. is rightly to be blamed for his catch-cloner efforts. >Sorry, but I don't share your strange opinion. For what reason does one disassembly other chess programs? Was there a beginning suspicion with El Chinito? Gerd > >Matthias.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.