Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Questions to Paul Hunter about the assembly

Author: Gerd Isenberg

Date: 23:38:15 08/23/04

Go up one level in this thread


On August 24, 2004 at 02:05:47, Paul H wrote:

>No, I did not add those addresses to the assembly code to make it look like
>Crafty code. Debuggers and disassemblers add those information. I have been
>accused of witch hunting also. So, your comment, however harsh it is, is not
>original.

Thanks for clarifying this again.
So the executable contained a symbol map.
Yes, witch hunting really came in my mind too.
And what your motive or intentions is, to disassembly other programs.
I met Eugenio two times at world championships,
96 and 99 and i can't believe it.

>
>And, you should not be making those kinds of comments regarding the relationship
>of high level languages (like C) and low-level languages (asm), because it
>reveals how much (or rather how little) you know. Others have answered you on
>that. There is no need for me to point out the obvious.

Yes i know rather little. I still had the hope based on those assembly lines
that there is an other possible cause. My apologies to you.

Cheers,
Gerd



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.