Author: Jarkko Pesonen
Date: 02:43:04 08/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 23, 2004 at 17:07:48, David Dahlem wrote:
>On August 23, 2004 at 16:17:00, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>
>>On August 23, 2004 at 15:51:59, David Dahlem wrote:
>>
>>>[D]6k1/1q3ppp/r7/1rp1P1n1/3p1P2/1P1R2PP/2Q4K/B4R2 b - - 0 1
>>>
>>>This position is taken from this thread:
>>>
>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?383382
>>>
>>>I let Crafty play white and ProDeo play black from this position at 40 moves in
>>>80 minutes. Crafty liked 4.Qe2 for a long time, but finally switched to 4. Rdd1.
>>
>>Unfortunatey this game is not very important because 4.Rdd1 is hopeless.
>>4.Qe2 is much better.
>>
>>Michael
>
>[D]6k1/1q3p1p/6pr/1rp1P3/3p1PK1/1P1R2P1/4Q3/B4R2 b - - 0 4
>
>This is what ProDeo says after 4.Qe2. This is, of course, on a rather slow
>P3/933/32mb hash.
>
>ProDeo UCI:
>
> 5 00:00 -1.82 4. ... Rh5 5.Qc2 Rb4 6.Rf2 Qd5
> 6 00:00 -1.83 4. ... Rh5 5.Bb2 Rxb3 6.Rxb3 Qxb3 7.Qg2 h6
> 7 00:01 -1.51 4. ... Rh5 5.f5 Rb4 6.Rff3 h6 7.Bb2
> 7 00:01 -1.61 4. ... Qd5 5.f5 gxf5+ 6.Rxf5 Rg6+ 7.Kf4 h6 8.Qd1
> 8 00:03 -1.35 4. ... Qd5 5.f5 Rh5 6.Bb2 Rb8 7.Bc1 h6
> 9 00:08 -1.35 4. ... Qd5 5.f5 Rh5 6.Qf3 Qd8 7.Qe4 Ra5 8.fxg6 fxg6
> 9 00:15 -1.35 4. ... Rb6
> 9 00:15 -1.35 4. ... Qd5 5.f5 Rh5 6.Qf3 Qd8 7.Qe4 Ra5 8.fxg6 fxg6
> 10 00:35 -1.05 4. ... Qd5 5.f5 Rb6 6.Bb2 Rh5 7.Bc1
> 10 00:37 -1.05 4. ... Rb6
> 10 00:46 -1.62 4. ... Rb6 5.f5 gxf5+ 6.Rxf5 Qh1 7.Bxd4 cxd4
> 11 02:29 -1.66 4. ... Rb6 5.Rdf3 Rb4 6.Rd3 Rh5 7.f5 Qe7 8.fxg6 Qg5+
> 12 05:29 -1.58 4. ... Rb6 5.Rdf3 Rb4 6.Rd3 Rh5 7.f5
>
>Regards
>Dave
Arfer Rb6
13 52:10 0.00 2. f5 gxf5+ 3. Rxf5 Qh1 4. Bxd4 cxd4
5. Rg5+ Rhg6 6. Rxg6+ hxg6 7. Kf4 Rb4
8. Qf3 Qc1+ 9. Ke4 Qc5 10. Kf4 <HT>
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.