Author: Deepak Nityanandam
Date: 12:06:46 08/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 24, 2004 at 15:01:41, Tom Likens wrote: >On August 24, 2004 at 14:56:40, Deepak Nityanandam wrote: > >>On August 24, 2004 at 14:27:45, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >> >>><snip> >>>>Bottom line is that any capitalistic advantage that we once had by hosting CCC >>>>(and CTF) has dwindled to nothing, but the time, work, and expense of operating >>>>the CCC and CTF have not. >>>> >>>>So, what's the answer? There are several choices: >>>> a) some other organization can take over the responsibility of hosting and >>>>running CCC and CTF >>>> b) CCC and CTF can be disbanded and members can rejoin the USENET Newsgroups >>>> c) members can pay a yearly fee to belong >>>> d) members can voluntarily contribute >>>> >>> >>> >>>Hi Steven, >>>i stick with Bo, >>>option d) $50-100 range yearly. >>> >>>Contributors have no preferences in moderator elections. >>> >>>IMHO in CTF there are often very interesting topics and readings, of course >>>beside sporadic racist and other questionable posts. I like to keep CCC and CTF >>>together. >>> >>>Cheers, >>>Gerd >>> >> >>The voice of reason.Thanks. >>For a moment I felt a modern day lynching in the making. >> >>I don't think CTF can survive on its own.Not everyone in CTF is Evil! > >Why not, if CTF is providing a worthwhile service than people should be >willing to pay for it. > You are quite right, but there are far few posters there, hence even if people pay for CTF it wont be economically viable, unless everyone coughs up ~100+ $ per year.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.