Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 15:57:33 08/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 24, 2004 at 18:26:33, Daniel Jackson wrote: >On August 24, 2004 at 17:44:18, Alvaro Jose Povoa Cardoso wrote: > >>On August 24, 2004 at 15:54:28, Daniel Jackson wrote: >> >>>On August 24, 2004 at 15:14:16, odell jones wrote: >>> >>>>Maybe there is still yet not enough games played? >>> >>>Make Shredder able to run on x number of processors and have a rematch. >>>Given sufficient hardware Hydra will lose all of its Heads! >> >>No doubt it will be stronger but the question is: how sufficient is sufficient? >> >> >>Regards, >>Alvaro > >That's a darn good question, and I'll let the true hardware experts answer it. >But I can say it will have to be supercomputer that is no less as fast or >powerful then Hydra is running on. Unlike Hydra, my guess would be a parallel >machine, not a cluster. > >http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=1866 I think we've not enough information about hydra to estimate the computer power needed for a classical chess engine to rival it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.