Author: Daniel Jackson
Date: 19:24:51 08/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 24, 2004 at 16:17:06, Steve B wrote: >>My guess is that eliminating the CTF would not save much money. As far as I can >>see, more is posted on CCC than CTF, so I assume that CTF is read less and >>consumes less bandwidth. > >while i cannot say what the costs are to maintain two sites,logic dictates there >is some additional cost which can be eliminated altogether > > >And CCC takes more effort to run, because CTF is >>unmoderated, except where the posts become extremely offensive. > >and even most of the extremely offensive posts are not deleted >i can certainly agree that the CTF is basically an unmoderated site spinning way >out of control >lets face it,why is this site even associated with the CCC? >there is seldom seen a post related to any topic on chess. > >with the singular exception of a handful of members who make an effort to post >messages containing reasoned arguments and reasonable opinions of any quality >the CTF has degenerated into a safe house for trolls,rascists,neo-nazis and the >like.. > >lets keep alive the hobby we all love..computer chess..and let the other site >die of natural causes.. > >Steve The sad thing is Steve, if you pay for CCC then you pay for CTF and I doubt Steve will cancel CTF. Sorry, but that is what the outcome most likely will be.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.