Author: Jonas Bylund
Date: 23:04:16 08/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 24, 2004 at 16:17:06, Steve B wrote: >>My guess is that eliminating the CTF would not save much money. As far as I can >>see, more is posted on CCC than CTF, so I assume that CTF is read less and >>consumes less bandwidth. > >while i cannot say what the costs are to maintain two sites,logic dictates there >is some additional cost which can be eliminated altogether > > >And CCC takes more effort to run, because CTF is >>unmoderated, except where the posts become extremely offensive. > >and even most of the extremely offensive posts are not deleted >i can certainly agree that the CTF is basically an unmoderated site spinning way >out of control >lets face it,why is this site even associated with the CCC? >there is seldom seen a post related to any topic on chess. > >with the singular exception of a handful of members who make an effort to post >messages containing reasoned arguments and reasonable opinions of any quality >the CTF has degenerated into a safe house for trolls,rascists,neo-nazis and the >like.. > >lets keep alive the hobby we all love..computer chess..and let the other site >die of natural causes.. > >Steve While i agree with you about CTF, then in all fairness, it is meant as a place for "chess thinkers" to share their views on all topics from chess to whatever. In other words there is not "on topic" theme, but if you set it up against the CCC, then why it is even there is beyond me... I would be more than willing to pay for CCC, but if that included CTF i would just frequent the winboard forum more often and forget about CCC, not in a million years would i pay to support CTF.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.