Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Microsoft could build a better chess program (but won't)

Author: blass uri

Date: 14:04:03 01/05/99

Go up one level in this thread



On January 05, 1999 at 14:53:18, KarinsDad wrote:

>IMO (for what it is worth), I think Microsoft could do a good job creating a
>"better chess program". I also think that most people here will disagree with me
>on this topic, hence, I think that if you created a poll question on this, most
>of the people would probably indicate that Microsoft could not create a much
>better chess program.
>
>My reasoning for why MS could do better is as follows:
>
>1) Knowing several Microsoft engineers and listening to them, I have come to
>realize that there are a lot of bright development engineers there. Obviously,
>there are exceptions to this rule, but I think that they have the talent to
>build a better mousetrap (or chess engine).
>
>2) There is a lot of information on the Internet currently (and in books and the
>ICCA journal, etc.) that would enable them to catch up fairly quickly, possibly
>as quickly as 9 to 12 months.
>
>3) Microsoft has a lot of resources, money, high speed equipment, and talent.
>Just look at what IBM did with Deep Blue. With Microsoft's money, they could
>purchase the source for Deep Blue, reverse engineer it, and improve upon it.
>They could also hire some of the original Deep Thought/Deep Blue engineers and
>possibly even other engineers from other chess engines.

I do not think that it is a good idea to hire the deep thought/deep blue
engineers

I was not impressed by this program
Deep blue is better than other programs but I believe that it is better only
because it is faster and not because the programmers are better than the top
programs programmers.

I think that a better idea to hire grandmasters and many workers to define rules
when a move is illogical based on database of many games( at least 1,000,000)

for example to look at all the positions when the move Bg2-h1 is possible and to
define a rule when Bg2-h1 is illogical.

The program can use many rules like this and do not have to search all the moves
and can do more intelligent search.

Uri




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.