Author: Reinhard Scharnagl
Date: 01:44:08 08/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2004 at 04:28:40, Madhavan wrote: >On August 26, 2004 at 04:19:27, Vikrant Malvankar wrote: > >>On August 26, 2004 at 03:10:55, Madhavan wrote: >> >>>According to 'FIDE' present top 10 players >>> >>>1 Kasparov, Garry g RUS 2817 >>>2 Anand, Viswanathan g IND 2782 >>>3 Kramnik, Vladimir g RUS 2770 >>>4 Morozevich, Alexander g RUS 2743 >>>5 Leko, Peter g HUN 2741 >>>6 Adams, Michael g ENG 2738 >>>7 Topalov, Veselin g BUL 2737 >>>8 Polgar, Judit g HUN 2728 >>>9 Svidler, Peter g RUS 2727 >>>10 Shirov, Alexei g ESP 2725 >>> >>>how would you rate Robert James 'Bobby' Fischer? >>>i would give 2740,i'm not sure if Bobby had almost forgotten 'super-GM style >>>chess'which he used to play way back 1970's >>>Fischer wouldnt give draw by agreement,continues to play till the end. >> >> >>Hi Madhavan >>I would give abt 2650-2680 at presnt Bobby must have been lagging b/h in New >>Opening Theory. However his natural talent(Middlegame,Superb tactics, Endgame) >>will not desert him so soon. Bobby with all the lastet Openings right up there >>man.In Fischer random Chess he might me the best player in the world with the >>confidence with which he says " I will only play Fischer random Chess and the >>Normal Chess is outdated & rotten to the core" >there are over 960 different starting positions, how could the arbiter choose a >random number? There are numerous tools which can do that for you, see: [http://www.chessbox.de/Compu/fullchess7_e.html] and also the new Arena Beta. A lot of easyly applicatable methods have been descripted in my book, see: [http://www.chessbox.de/Compu/fullchess1_e.html]. >so the Fischer Random chess is not fair Nonsense. Regards, Reinhard. >>Regards >> >>Vicky
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.